Skip to main content

Paper and Game of the Week

This past week I attended (and co-chaired, organized a workshop for, and presented at) the International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (ICIDS). In celebration of a successful ICIDS, I'll share a Paper and Game of the Week each of which I discovered during it.

Paper of the Week: "Using BDI to Model Players Behaviour in an Interactive Fiction Game"

By Jessica Rivera-Villicana, Fabio Zambetta, James Harland, and Marsha Berry; available for download on ResearchGate. Disclaimer: I attended the talk about this paper, but have only skimmed the text of the paper itself.

Player modeling is a sub-area of game AI concerned with representing and tracking players' mental states and experiences while playing a game. This is the first paper I've seen addressing the problem in an interactive narrative context. BDI stands for Belief, Desire, and Intention, a philosophical framework for agent modeling (from 1987) that supposes all actions are driven by those three things, which relate to one another in the following way:
  • Agents are inherently assumed to have goals, which create desires;
  • Agents observe things about the world, which form beliefs;
  • Desires and beliefs inform intentions, which drive action toward specific goals.
The hypothesis stated in this work is that BDI suffices as a model of "folk psychology," or "how I think you think," as Rivera-Villicana put it in her talk -- so in turn, it can be used to model a human player's traversal of a constructed, text-rendered space with a short puzzle and a win condition. Having a good model of how humans play this kind of game, i.e. how they traverse the space to find a solution, can inform better design of interactive stories.

My favorite slide of the talk was a comparison between example play traces between the optimal playthrough and more cognitively-realistic playthroughs:


In a sense I kind of see player modeling in general, and this study in particular, as a kind of Wason selection task of game AI: it proves that theoretically optimal or rational reasoning makes a poor model for human reasoning, and in this case demonstrates it in the context of reasoning about what actions to take in an unknown environment. 

Game of the Week: Fiasco



I finally got a chance to play Fiasco, a decentralized improvisational roleplaying game, with a few other conference attendees. I'd been hearing excellent things about it since Ian Horswill presented a system for generating Fiasco playsets at EXAG a year ago.

Game Summary

The premise is somewhere between freeform improvisation and tabletop roleplaying. The players (up to 5; my group had 4) sit in a circle, and the story is set up by forming relationships between adjacent pairs of people. For each pair, one member chooses a general category appropriate to a genre (e.g. family, work, crime, romance) and the other member chooses a specific relationship within that category (e.g. grandma, boss, drug dealer/client, ex-lover). They also choose a need, location, or object that relates to this relationship. Finally, players flesh out their characters with names and backgrounds and the details of the relationships they've outlined.

Play then proceeds cyclically with each player opting to either establish or resolve a scene, with the other players collaboratively filling in the complementary task (resolving or establishing). Midway through the game's 4 rounds, something called The Tilt happens, a crucial turning point in the action selected similarly to the character relationships, through an agreement between two players determined by a die roll. At the very end, the Aftermath scenes wrap up each character's storyline.

My Experience

I'm pretty terrible at Improv -- I'm much more reflective than action-oriented, so it's hard for me to decisively manufacture narrative content under time pressure. That makes me pretty terrible at Fiasco, too. Luckily, the storytelling is collaborative, so there were few situations wherein my indecision actually held up the game -- often many people would suggest ideas that I could pick from among.

Occasionally I wished the game had more structure, or perhaps just that I were more practiced at it. I sort of enjoy the idea that the game's fun can scale with the players' creativity, but on the other hand, I wonder if the game could do more to support player creativity, e.g. a deck of cards with prompts to "unstick" hard-to-resolve situations, or an additional constraint to resolve the paralysis of a blank page (actually worse: friends staring at you while you think!). (Alcohol helps, but we ran out of bourbon too quickly.)

Collaborative storymaking

I loved having played this game in the evening preceding an amazing keynote talk by Semi Chellas, who spoke about her experience writing for Mad Men. She had a lot to say about the process of writing collaboratively, as a collective brain consisting of many humans, about the process of sharing an experience with a piece of music or a movie or a poetry reading to put everyone in the same mindset, then churning out ten stories per person in the space of two weeks. She frequently spoke of how story outcomes were overdetermined a lot, as in, "we all knew that X had to happen but there were too many reasons it could happen," and how the "multiplicity of voices & perspectives" in the writer's room sorted each other out and influenced each other to come into harmony ("we dream each other's dreams"). On the other hand, there are also constraints: a TV show can only be 47m03s long and this event has to happen on this timeline and this character needs to appear in these scenes... she called this the "crossword puzzle" aspect of TV writing. An absolutely stunning example of fitting an overdetermined story into an overconstrained crossword puzzle was the central plotline of the episode The Other Woman around the pursuit of the Jaguar account, which I recommend watching if you have the ability (e.g. Netflix).

Anyway, the experience she described sounded nothing like playing Fiasco, but I appreciated the context it gave me.

Bonus Game of the Week: The Room

First-day ICIDS keynote speaker Kevin Bruner of Telltale (and, less recently, well-loved games like Grim Fandango) discussed puzzle games in the a Q&A question about why Telltale doesn't do them. He offhandedly mentioned the iOS game The Room, which I then promptly downloaded (having believed I basically knew about all popular small-scale room-escape-style games from the last decade, but apparently being wrong).



It's kind of like Monument Valley but a tad less obvious. Has a "puzzle box" premise with controls that are pleasantly physical, if occasionally clumsy. Very pretty, narrative-light, just the right amount of mentally taxing to recharge one's introvert battery with at the end of a long day of conference socializing (for example).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Twine for Games Research (Part II)

This preliminary discussion introduced my thoughts on using Twine as a tool for creating prototypes for games research. I'll start with documenting my first case study: a hack-and-slash RPG-like setting where the player character has a record of attributes ("stats") that evolve through actions that turn certain resources (money, health, items) into others. I've selected this hack-and-slash example because it falls outside the canonical "branching story" domain thought to be Twine's primary use case, but it is not too much trickier to implement. It relies crucially on the management of state in ways that simple branching stories would not, but it does so in a fairly straightforward way.

If all goes well, this post may also serve as a tutorial on the "basics" of Twine (links + variables + expressions). In particular, I'll be using Twine 2/Harlowe, and I haven't seen many tutorials for this new version published yet.

To me, the main "…

Why I don't like the term "AI"

Content note: I replicate some ableist language in this post for the sake of calling it out as ableist.

In games research, some people take pains to distinguish artificial intelligence from computational intelligence (Wikipedia summary), with the primary issue being that AI cares more about replicating human behavior, while CI is "human-behavior-inspired" approaches to solving concrete problems. I don't strongly identify with one of these sub-areas more than the other; the extent to which I hold an opinion is mainly that I find the distinction a bit silly, given that the practical effects seem mainly to be that there are two conferences (CIG and AIIDE) that attract the same people, and a journal (TCIAIG - Transactions on Computational Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence in Games) that seems to resolve the problem by replacing instances of "AI" with "CI/AI."

I have a vague, un-citeable memory of hearing another argument from people who dislike the…

Using Twine for Games Research (Part III)

Where we last left off, I described Twine's basic capabilities and illustrated how to use them in Twine 2 by way of a tiny hack-and-slash RPG mechanic. You can play the result, and you should also be able to download that HTML file and use Twine 2's "import file" mechanism to load the editable source code/passage layout.

Notice that, in terms of game design, it's not much more sophisticated than a slot machine: the only interesting decision we've incorporated is for the player to determine when to stop pushing her luck with repeated adventures and go home with the current spoils.

What makes this type of RPG strategy more interesting to me is the sorts of decisions that can have longer-term effects, the ones where you spend an accumulation of resources on one of several things that might have a substantial payoff down the road. In a more character-based setting, this could be something like increasing skill levels or adding personality traits.

Often, the game-…